Is This The Center Point

[myfs_150244]

Dear Sir,

Is this the center point of the layout ? If it is, can I say that all the blank area is missing corner ?

Thank you

[Cecil Lee]

1. Please see my comments in the attached illustrations: Example ONE and Example TWO.
2. Majority of the time; many of us more often than not; visualise only Missing areas.
3. Many or rather the majority often don't seem to see "protusions" (if any).
4. The other kindergarten type is to print out an outline of the layout; place it on a card-board and try to balance it on a pin to find the center-of-gravity (British = centre; American = center -- who cares!)
5. In my opinion; most likely if one does Para 4; most likely it should be close to Example ONE. Where the missing area(s) often should be equal to the protusion(s).
6. In the example(s) One and Two; YELLOW = missing areas and LIGHT BLUE = protusion(s)
7. The good news is that because this unit has missing areas on each side of a "rectangle"; your marking of the centre-point is also very close to examples ONE and TWO.
7.1. One good thing about this layout plan is that it is pretty rectangularish. As such, in my opinion; whatever method one uses; or rather the margin of "error" is low and for sure; so long as one reasonably get it ok looking; the centre-point would normally not deviate too much along an imaginary line.
7.2. In your example, the only thing to take note is that I believe one should also remember not to discount the possibility of a partial protusion. (As shown in examples one and two). It is good that you had considered to ignore the small protusion on the left side. (bay window area).
7.3. Protusions need not be so clear-cut as much as a room space. It can be part of any "protuding" space.

Quote

On 10/13/2011 9:08:30 PM, Anonymous wrote:
Dear Sir,
Is this the center point
of the layout ? If it is, can
I say that all the blank area
is missing corner ?
Thank you

[Cecil Lee]

1. I refer to the attached example: Example THREE as the "lazy person method: or simply the no passion in work type of method.
2. Often, this method is used by some Geomancers who hire staff to prepare reports for them.
3. And, if one look at the attachment carefully, this method of finding the centre-point is indeed a no-brainer senario: Find all the corners and join each opposite corners to determine the centre-point.
4. I believe in this way, the Geomancer do not need to have their staff breathing behind their backs all the time to check with them: Did I correctly get the centre-point right?"
5. However, in my opinion; this type of method may be used especially if the home or apartment is towards circular or oval type of shape or star shaped (if any) type of layout.
5.1 Otherwise, examples ONE, TWO and even your layout seems much better than the attached Example Three.
6. Personally, I won't recommend this method especially if the layout is more or less rectangular in shape. As one can see, the center-point seems unreal as it is shifted so much to the left side. Unlike examples ONE and TWO and even your determined centre-point which is along an imaginery line just that they are a few gradiants away from each other...

Quote

On 10/13/2011 11:08:39 PM, Anonymous wrote:
1. Please see my comments in the
attached illustrations: Example ONE and
Example TWO.2. Majority of the time;
many of us more often than not;
visualise only Missing areas. 3. Many or
rather the majority often don't seem to
see "protusions" (if any).4. The other
kindergarten type is to print out an
outline of the layout; place it on a
card-board and try to balance it on a
pin to find the center-of-gravity
(British = centre; American = center --
who cares!)5. In my opinion; most likely
if one does Para 4; most likely it
should be close to Example ONE. Where
the missing area(s) often should be
equal to the protusion(s).6. In the
example(s) One and Two; YELLOW =
missing areas and LIGHT BLUE =
protusion(s)7. The good news is that
because this unit has missing areas on
each side of a "rectangle"; your marking
of the centre-point is also very close
to examples ONE and TWO.7.1. One good
thing about this layout plan is that it
is pretty rectangularish. As such, in my
opinion; whatever method one uses; or
rather the margin of "error" is low and
for sure; so long as one reasonably get
it ok looking; the centre-point would
normally not deviate too much along an
imaginary line.7.2. In your example, the
only thing to take note is that I
believe one should also remember not to
discount the possibility of a partial
protusion. (As shown in examples one and
two). It is good that you had considered
to ignore the small protusion on the
left side. (bay window area).7.3.
Protusions need not be so clear-cut as
much as a room space. It can be part of
any "protuding" space.On 10/13/2011
9:08:30 PM, Khor Kar Joo wrote:
Dear
Sir,
Is this the center point
of the layout ? If it is, can
I
say that all the blank area
is
missing corner ?
Thank you