Staff Cecil Lee Posted December 22, 1999 Staff Share Posted December 22, 1999 Note: This message contains 7 pictures (Size of each picture is between 23k to 54k each. Please wait for it to be loaded fully.)Facts about this project:- Project Name: The Fortredale.- Location: 2, Tanjong Rhu Road, Singapore.- 32 units (2 units each floor).- Full Glass Facade at the frontage of the building. (Brick wall behind)- Glass private lift.- "Distincitive roof decorative piece.- The plot is land is on an acceptable rectangular shaped.Picture 1, size = 23kPicture 2 see below, size = 26kBelow, In my opinion, I am not happy with the type of full glass facade used. If you see the picture clearly, you will find that the type of window is not the traditional type but rather those commonly found e.g. in a toilet i.e. the "lift up type". The entire frontage of the house uses this "lift up type" windows e.g in the Master bedroom, living room, bedrooms etc...In my opinion, it does not allow Qi to properly come in thru the frontage of the house and circulate within the house.Also in a `hot' country like Singapore, this would result in having to use the airconditioning all the time. Picture 3 see below, size = 32kBelow, the units facing East, have green tinted glass. While the units facing West, uses Blue tinted glass. Do note that any use of the colours, I believe is not based on Feng Shui but rather decorative colours. If one really base on Feng Shui, the West side glass facade should be using White or or gold colours.Furthermore, because of the full glass facade, one has no choice but to use curtains all around the facade of the house in order to give each room proper `privacy'. The result is a set of ugly curtains stringing along the top glass panels. Very impractical indeed i.e. not practical type of house to live in. In addition, the windows are not user-friendly.Picture 4, see below, size = 33kBelow, It is my opinion that this building is unfriendly towards its neighbour as it has two `metallic' bomberang shaped roof decorative showpiece that, I feel is threathening to its neighbours.Picture 5, see below, size = 54kPicture 6, see below, size = 23kPicture 7, see below, size = 23kOverall, I give this `building' thumbs down. In my opinion, I believe it does not go well with the discerning Singaporeans as few units have been sold so far. A far cry from other buildings which are quickly snapped up by Singaporeans. I believe this building has been up and ready for occupancy for at least more than 5 or 6 months already. This has got to be the lowest occupancy building I have seen for a long time. So far, I have seen ONLY one resident hang (within the house, a set of curtains. It looks terrible from outside). If you take a peak into the building, you will notice that most of the units/apartments are not occupied.Other than this unit, I do not not see anyone else staying in this 32 unit apartment. As for the layout plan of the interior of the apartments, they are rectangular in shaped but because of its exterior, full glass facade, in my opinion, I find this building one of the `worst' constructed building for someone looking for a `decent' house.Please note that the above are my fair comments based on my accessment of the exterior of the building only. So far, I have not made any assessment of the interior of the housing project. In my opinion, this exterior glass facade would go better with an office building as it would be fully airconditioned.Disclaimer: The above are meant as teaching materials. It is not my intention to `hurt' the sale of units further. But, in my opinion, this is one of the `worst' housing development, I have seen for a long time: not practical to live in and an unfriendly buidling to its neigbhours and thus deserve mentioning. Overall, in the final analysis, it is up to the individual to form their personal opinion over it.Warmest Regards,Cecil Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Staff Cecil Lee Posted March 16, 2013 Staff Share Posted March 16, 2013 The Fortredale which was newer than many of the developments had enbloc and sold has sold for around $65 million.Thank God for it. As for liveability; it each unit looks more like a fish aquarium when one walks past it during both day and night!However, somehow, in it's place The Line, even with it's enticing lucky draw of a BMW 3 series vehicle ... seems in my opinion to suffer from poor sales... (where each unit is sold roughly at 2,xxx per sq feet. Quote On 12/22/1999 7:21:05 PM, Anonymous wrote:Note: This message contains 7pictures (Size of each pictureis between 23k to 54k each.Please wait for it to beloaded fully.)Facts about this project:- Project Name: TheFortredale.- Location: 2, Tanjong RhuRoad, Singapore.- 32 units (2 units eachfloor).- Full Glass Facade at thefrontage of the building.(Brick wall behind)- Glass private lift.- "Distincitive roofdecorative piece.- The plot is land is on anacceptable rectangular shaped.Picture 1, size = 23kPicture 2 see below, size =26kBelow, In my opinion, I am nothappy with the type of fullglass facade used. If you seethe picture clearly, you willfind that the type of windowis not the traditional typebut rather those commonlyfound e.g. in a toilet i.e.the "lift up type".The entire frontage of thehouse uses this "lift up type"windows e.g in the Masterbedroom, living room, bedroomsetc...In my opinion, it does notallow Qi to properly come inthru the frontage of the houseand circulate within thehouse.Also in a `hot' country likeSingapore, this would resultin having to use theairconditioning all the time.Picture 3 see below, size =32kBelow, the units facing East,have green tinted glass. Whilethe units facing West, usesBlue tinted glass. Do notethat any use of the colours, Ibelieve is not based on FengShui but rather decorativecolours.If one really base on FengShui, the West side glassfacade should be using Whiteor or gold colours.Furthermore, because of thefull glass facade, one has nochoice but to use curtains allaround the facade of the housein order to give each roomproper `privacy'. The resultis a set of ugly curtainsstringing along the top glasspanels. Very impracticalindeed i.e. not practical typeof house to live in. Inaddition, the windows are notuser-friendly.Picture 4, see below, size =33kBelow, It is my opinion thatthis building is unfriendlytowards its neighbour as ithas two `metallic' bomberangshaped roof decorativeshowpiece that, I feel isthreathening to itsneighbours.Picture 5, see below, size =54kPicture 6, see below, size =23kPicture 7, see below, size =23kOverall, I give this`building' thumbs down. In myopinion, I believe it does notgo well with the discerningSingaporeans as few units havebeen sold so far.A far cry from other buildingswhich are quickly snapped upby Singaporeans. I believethis building has been up andready for occupancy for atleast more than 5 or 6 monthsalready. This has got to bethe lowest occupancy buildingI have seen for a long time.So far, I have seen ONLY oneresident hang (within thehouse, a set of curtains. Itlooks terrible from outside).If you take a peak into thebuilding, you will notice thatmost of the units/apartmentsare not occupied.Other than this unit, I do notnot see anyone else staying inthis 32 unit apartment.As for the layout plan of theinterior of the apartments,they are rectangular in shapedbut because of its exterior,full glass facade, in myopinion, I find this buildingone of the `worst' constructedbuilding for someone lookingfor a `decent' house.Please note that the above aremy fair comments based on myaccessment of the exterior ofthe building only. So far, Ihave not made any assessmentof the interior of the housingproject. In my opinion, thisexterior glass facade would gobetter with an office buildingas it would be fullyairconditioned.Disclaimer: The above aremeant as teaching materials.It is not my intention to`hurt' the sale of unitsfurther. But, in my opinion,this is one of the `worst'housing development, I haveseen for a long time: notpractical to live in and anunfriendly buidling to itsneigbhours and thus deservementioning. Overall, in thefinal analysis, it is up tothe individual to form theirpersonal opinion over it.Warmest Regards,Cecil Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now