Confusion about location of stars 5 and 2 in 2003

[myfs_77438]

Dear Cecil:
When I look at your year 2003 flying star analysis, it shows the star 5 (misfortune) is in the southeast sector and star 2 (sickness) is in the north sector.
However, when I ran the flying star for my house and my brother's house (both were built in period 7), it shows the star 5 is in the east sector and star 2 is in the south sector. Would you please explain this?
Thank you so much as always,
hoa

[Cecil Lee]

Dear Hoa Luong,
The report you generated is for the 20 year Flying Star for period 7.
However, the Year 2003 report is based on this year, thus the difference.
One should look at the 20 year Flying Star numbers first and relate it to (any additional adverse stars of the Year 2003) which may make the sector worse-off.
For example, for a South-West house at 240 degrees, the 20 year Flying Star for Period 7 are as follows:-
#3 mountain #2 water with base #5 and Year 4
while for North is #5 mountain with #9 water and base #3. And Year 2.
In such a situation, for such a house; Year 2 flew into the North and made the sector worse-off!
This is how, we relate the Year i.e. 2003 to the 20 Year Flying Star chart of say Period 7 house.
Warmest Regards,
Cecil

Quote

On 5/11/2003 9:07:32 PM, Anonymous wrote:
Dear Cecil:
When I look at your year 2003
flying star analysis, it shows
the star 5 (misfortune) is in
the southeast sector and star
2 (sickness) is in the north
sector.
However, when I ran the flying
star for my house and my
brother's house (both were
built in period 7), it shows
the star 5 is in the east
sector and star 2 is in the
south sector. Would you
please explain this?
Thank you so much as always,
hoa